Swatches Maybelline Dream Matte Mousse

2 Kings. Make



The last vision is all that remains of the work.
The game, like all games, is virtually infinite.
Passenger Terrestrial

How To Disable A Poptropica Account

Before And After Torticollis

Eluana in the country of double obedience

www.repubblica.it by Ezio Mauro

So probably unconscious, but certainly painful for him, is leading Beppino Englaro in the light of day after day, some unsolved problems of the modern state of which we are citizens, and we look - or should we - as the sole holder of sovereignty. This is, as noted by Roberto Saviano, the father of Eluana looking for a solution to his family tragedy in a public, precisely because the teacher makes almost universal, in the eyes of the entire country, forced for the first time collectively to question about life and death, from compassion for an individual. Aside from the pettiness of those who seek a short-term political gain from this personal and national tragedy, making a hasty round of government claims of the Church against a ruling Republican Party and the delays aphasics on the other side of those who linger to talk instead of Villari, what we are living - and suffering - is a high point of the debate civil and morale of the country. Provided understood. Certainly is part of public discussion that must involve all, the intervention of Cardinal Poletto. It is the bishop of Turin, the city where the regional president, Mercedes Bresso, said she was ready to host Eluana and his family for that last act that the State has recognized as legitimate with a final ruling, and that the government wants to avoid any means. While other Catholics have argued that "death has found a home in Turin," the Cardinal has not used these tones, but said it condemns euthanasia, although you feel close to the father of Eluana, pray for him and not judge. But I want to discuss publicly, if possible, the deeper meaning and scope of the two statements of the Cardinal. The first is the invitation to conscientious objection of doctors, who Poletto must refuse to stay in Piedmont force feeding Eluana, coming into conflict with the family's request and with the ruling that the legitimate. There is no doubt that the individual conscience can rebel against this outcome, and the doctor - believer or not - can live a deep labor between his public role in a state hospital serving the citizens and their demands, his duty professional who puts in the service of the sick and their suffering, and indeed its most authentic moral beliefs. This labor can lead to extreme decisions completely understandable and respectable, like that to object to his public role and their professional task precisely because the conscience does not allow it, whatever the cost: in some cases, as noted here yesterday Adriano Sofri The cost of this opposition of consciousness was very high. It seems to me - just in consciousness - the very different case in which believers are urged doctors collectively by a cardinal (almost as a single profession from moving and confessional union) to mobilize the same time and anywhere for aborting a sentence of State, regardless moral and rational reflection of everyone, from the time and manner with which everyone can freely settle the matter, the different sensitivity to the piety and Christian charity, but in a common faith. Here you can talk if you are honest, conscientious objection: if anything the bond of belonging, because the Catholic identity of those doctors became lever and collective instrument to bet on hierarchical pulse to nullify a ruling of the Republic. This is possible because the Cardinal explains clearly the concept of dual obedience and hierarchy that follows. The modern state and secular, free "from the" Church as the free grants "in the statement, apply the distinction between the fundamental law of the Creator and the creatures of the law. Poletto argues that since the law of God can never be against the man, going against God's law is to go against the man, so if the two laws come into conflict "because the law is not a man good law, "and the Catholic can break it. The law of God is above the law of man. This statement is worth pondering, for the consequences that necessarily entails. It is the conception announced a few years ago by Cardinal Ruini, that Catholicism is a kind of second nature of the Italians, then the laws that conflict with Catholic principles are automatically unnatural, and as such not only can, but deserve to be disobeyed. This idea follows the theory of the new Italian Catholicism in recent years: the moral precepts of the Church's social doctrine and its overlap with the natural law, then state law must base its strength on the coincidence with this Catholic moral and natural, thus transforming Catholicism as a religion of people in civil religion, creating a sort of real political idea of \u200b\u200bthe Christian religion. But if the law of God is above the law of man, if in obedience to double back to the Church on the State also prevails in the application of laws and judgments, two questions arise: what is a citizen of the devout Catholic, if he lives the possibility of being asked to violate the hierarchy, argue, disobey? And that concept has the Italian Church, with its bishops and cardinals, democracy and the rule? Someone has to remember that in the separation of church and state, after merging the functions of the pagan priest to civil authorities, religion is not part of "jus publicum" human law is not part of the divine with the Church that administration, public institutions and their acts are autonomous from the chair of the bishops and denominational teaching. The town doctor who is ordered to act on behalf of a third identity - Supreme -, that of a Catholic, does not object on behalf of his conscience, but to obey authority as opposed to the state, and calls for greater obedience, final, total capital to the Truth, out of which everything relativism. Only in a democracy that all truth is relative, even the beliefs and values \u200b\u200bare relative to those who profess them, and nobody can impose it on others. Because there is no truth outside of reserves than the free play of democracy, which of course must give full freedom for all religions to rule on any matter, including the responsibility of the State to reaffirm its doctrine. Knowing well that the Church speaks to the conscience of believers and those who recognize the moral authority, but the decision in its practical policy choice is the autonomous decision of lay people - believers and unbelievers - under their responsibility: that is the word of modern democracy and conscious, with whom Barack Obama has signed the start of his presidency. Therefore there is a form of "religious obligation" on the basis of the laws of a free democratic state, in which indeed no person can claim 'to possess the truth any more than any other can claim to possess. " It should finally go down a moral equality in the public discussion, by denying the prejudice that modern democracy, the modern state and the civic culture that are deficient without the resulting bond with the eternity of Christian thought, is insufficient in substance. It is from this injury such violence of language against the new right-wing Catholic who calls the state law, court rulings, the Republican rules. As if to lay his life is not a value, and practice the culture of death. As if the concept of freedom for a family torn apart, fraternity for a father in front of a supreme test, for sharing his pain that is not imaginable, not count. As if it were only the Italian Catholic consciousness. Finally, as if the Catholic conscience in a democracy, was unable to finish in the minority before the state.

Matlab Tornado Diagram

farewell letter of Attorney Gabriella Nuzzi National Association of Magistrates

"Mr. President,
I communicate with my, the irrevocable decision to leave the National Association of Magistrates. The
made publicly applauded by you injustice suffered at the hands policy, we Magistrates of the Public Prosecutor of Salerno is intolerably offensive to me.
offensive to my dignity as a person and to be Magistrate.
I was, in general cowardly silence, publicly insulted, blamed ignorance, negligence, recklessness, lack of sense of institution, and finally moved away from my home and functions of private investigators, so, in the blink of an eye, based on nothing legal and summary trials.

For his mouth and his friends and colleagues, the position of the Association was already known, from the beginning.

What to blame? Have, contrary to the profuse appearance, duly adopted and executed judicial legitimate and necessary, those deemed competent judicial fora.
Having responded to instances of truth and justice. Having found a disturbing reality, however, had to remain concealed.

Neither she nor any of the members of the association that represents worthily today has felt the need to understand and explain what really happened, the seriousness and drama of a story that calls for deep reflection the entire Judiciary, on its past, what is its future, and not certainly in the interests of individual staff or its sponsors associations, but by virtue of a higher ideal reason, which is - or should be - constantly and permanently living in the consciousness of every magistrate: the search for truth.

easier to pretend to believe a lie: the conflict, the war between prosecutors, the isolation of madness "loose cannon". The scandal raises
disorder: is sedated immediately and severely punished.
The people will know that this is right.
It will be worth the sacrifice of a few reasons of state.

The Association does not intend to treat. Closed.

In these days of pain, Mr President, my thoughts turn to the solemn words that you (as reported by the press) would have been publicly uttered a few moments after the original "conviction" means "The system has demonstrated that antibodies.

Thus, the system, once again, has proven to work.

I wonder, then, restless as a "system" you refer to.
What the "system" that feels so proud representative and guarantor.

A "system" that is not capable of ensuring the observance of minimum rules of civilized life, the application enforcement of sentences?
A "system" in which the statement is given in vain judicial review of the fundamental rights of human beings, instances where the weak are oppressed and trampled the pain of those victims still crying for blood?
A "system" in which the commitment and sacrifice of silent individual is crushed under the weight of an infernal machine, the gears jammed hopelessly antiquated and now?
A "system" subservient to the interests of power, which is cheaper to lock up the truth in dusty drawers and continue to dot the brilliant career success?

Tell me, Mr. President, such antibodies would be that it is able to generate? Exemplary punishment to those who are loyal and brave and impunity for those who blatantly breaks the law? And

such as viruses?

And explain to me again, what would be "the model suitable for a constitutional role of judges and the importance of the interests involved the exercise of jurisdiction" that the Association intends to promote?

Now, the "system" that I see is not in a position to be able to work.
the contrary, it is sick, dying, suffering from incurable cancer, which will lead inexorably to death.
And I do not want to be part of it, because I'm alive and I want to build something good for our children.
I swore allegiance to the only court order and the rule of the Italian Republic.

The sudden violence with which, in response to a political rating, it was summarily decided the deprivation of the investigative functions and removal of investigations under way against magistrates who have only fulfilled his duties, makes, frankly, very disturbing your tired and empty proclamations, now spoken only to yourself, as in a mirror split.

While you're distracted by the sight of some captivating mirage, a whistle and I tell you that the principles at stake here is the autonomy and independence jurisdiction. Not the private garden plots.

not worth the trouble never step on and let it trample the dignity of human beings.

For myself, I know I'll meet with the same strength, honesty and professionalism functions other than that I have been unjustly torn, with absolute respect, as always, constitutional principles, primary among them is that the Law must be equal to the weak and powerful.
I know I have strong and well next to the consciences of those who still, despite everything, believes in and fights every day for the affirmation of legality.
And that is that it will always continue to love and honor this profound work.

Mr. President, continues to represent himself and this Association.
I prefer to represent me alone. "

Dr. Gabriella Nuzzo
Magistrate

Chest Pains With Blurred Vision

Renato Soru began the campaign in Sardinia

How To Make Scandinavian Decoration

gravure




drypoint on CD ...
printed fresh fresh today ..

Full Eternity Diamond Ring Dubai

MEANWHILE FLOWS


also just finished this more ...
which is for you a special ...