Padre Livio - The origin of the human body (audio)
Dear Father Livio,
are Galdy Frederick I write from Cutro (KR).
I am writing, first, to thank for the commitment with which strives to spread the word of God through radio and the ability with which it fills the void that some life left in us.
Three days ago, around one o'clock in the night I attended his lecture on creationism and evolutionism seen under a Christian point of view, I found his speech very interesting and for this reason I have been completely and carefully.
I must say that I was amazed by his statements, which views from my perspective as a Christian and a student (very interested in biology and what governs life), led me to write to express my regret for superficially with who has tackled a subject so beautiful.
must confess that I had trouble sleeping because I had finished his speech in the head a single question: What could understand people who have never studied biology or who has never studied this subject? The answer I will try to make him understand the rest of the mail.
Almost half of his speech he introduced the topic "The origin of the human body," she said immediately that the source of the body is the job of science to establish and that the creation of the immortal soul of man is the work of God, something which I fully agree.
Subsequently, when referring to the "god chance" and natural selection, she says, man is the most advanced animal derived from monkeys, that intelligence is the result of secretion of the brain and those who follow these ideas teaches us that the apes evolved (and permanent electric razor for details). Nothing could be further from the truth may be associated with natural selection and the mechanisms that regulate life. First of all, Darwin's theories are now confirmed by both biology and paleontology. Darwin did not claim at all that everything is driven by the case, but sensed that the mutations were random, then the evolution is not random but is regulated by many factors that make mutations of a species more suitable or less suitable for life itself.
So there is no need to conduct life according to that principle, but are naturally occurring genetic recombinations (the scientists have not invented) and are three independent assortment, recombination (crossing over) and random mating. Phenomena that Darwin could not know at the time as they are the result of recent findings and did not even presume to interpret in its own way but as we know he left a gap in his theory that has been filled later.
Regarding your statement "man is the most advanced animal resulting from apes," which has given to scientists who follow the theory of evolution, I must contradict you on this: man is the animal most advanced and is not derived from monkeys, anyone who has made such claims, unfortunately, wrong.
It seems necessary to leave the field by these false notions, namely that the man had some resemblance in the past with the chimpanzee monkey or some other type of current, the group it belongs to the chimpanzee and that includes our species account two divergent branches of the family tree of ominoidei, these lines were differentiated from a single ancestor that belonged neither the first nor the second group.
Now I do three questions: Who is more evolved an Eskimo? A native of the Amazon? Or a New Yorker?
Who is more evolved a tiger that lives in the savannah? The White Tiger of the snows? Or the Siberian tiger?
Who is more evolved an olive tree, a Siberian tiger or a man? As
seem stupid questions I assure you that they are not, the answer is clear to all three questions are all evolved the same way, try to transfer a native to New York to the first signal will be put under, but the same What concerns the transfer of a sudden New York in the Amazon rainforest, how to live? Not much because even if it was not torn apart by some animals the ability to find food or water is zero.
Then each group is adapted to its environment. Same for the tigers and the olive trees. I do not think I can be clearer.
then continuing said that there are scientists who say that man comes from monkeys, but if anything the opposite is the ape man is derived, which could be a secondary branch of a goal that God has pursued directly and that there is no evolution from ape to man and it would appear on earth with all its splendor, beauty, intelligence, ability to decide. We
to clarify realizes the words she said, her voice was pleased to hear it. In practice, she has expressed in relation to claims of some scientists (who I'd love to know me a laugh) that man comes from monkeys and that if anything the opposite may be all that and being pursued directly by God .
I believe that even the most radical creationists believe people laughed, would God created man in all its glory, then this would be transformed or evolved ape to achieve an objective of God
These are pure crap and it also tells you: GM is not absolutely proven the transition from one species to another, but it proved evolution.
In reference to his statements on paleontology who does not show the evolution from ape to man to do right, but has shown, even with the help of biology, the gradual process of evolution of man as the findings are very few in relation to the great period of time that you go to study.
He adds that there are scientists who say that modern man has no ancestors, and that would appear in its current form without a progressive, but who are these people base their studies on what words, or are these just trivial attributes that make them large? Or is there someone to come in handy as this crap?
She says continuing: "there is documentation that the man suddenly appears in all its glory, this is a fact," I hope to tell me where I can retrieve this documentation! I do not think exists.
When she interprets the statements by the internationally renowned biologist, who says that biology proves that man comes from monkeys and from man himself, adds that modern man is derived from ancestral forms of man and upsets the gist of the allegations of the biologist.
I repeat the apes and man have never resembled or evolved from one another but both derive from a common ancestor and biology proves, in fact, the chimpanzee is the animal closest to humans at the genetic level, does not mean that the chimpanzee is the second most intelligent animals but that the DNA is similar to that of the man as derived from a common ancestor.
Sequence said that it is a miracle that science can not explain the appearance of man and the first living cell on earth. These two are crap just take a good book to read in biology to understand is that the Miller-Urey experiment which was just recently confirmed validity.
Believe me I am sorry for having written these things, but I could not help myself repudiation of falsehoods told by some biased scientists in satiric as he gave me the will to let her know my disappointment and my bewilderment.
The lesson she led me believe that people will do well to listen to it you can not impose the faith of creationism basing everything on lies. I say that is not no way to reconcile the idea of \u200b\u200bcreationism and evolution, in fact there are many points that should be investigated.
not inculcate ideas into people's minds, but it is the duty of all work to ensure that all those who are willing to develop close understanding with two elements that are the very image of God, that our hearts and our intelligence.
Since it is the first time I am writing to let you know I also acted as a disappointment to all at Radio Maria in the past with the referendum, which proposed the use of embryonic stem cells, have led people to believe that the use of these cells was a sin against God and this deterred them from going to vote you have to do what our Constitution is called civic duty.
What have you resolved? Nothing! You helped to create a legislative hole that brings people to flee abroad to have rights that are denied him in Italy.
cells were extracted from blastocysts, which are an early form of the embryo that does not exceed 150 cells that were not to be implanted in any case, they were designed to be used for the reconstruction of damaged parts of our body, such as nerve tissue incapable of regeneration.
Stem cells are unspecialized cells that can be used to heal people with, for example, ALS, MS, people who have experienced trauma, etc ...
You have put everything in front of your conscience not your courage because I did not heard none of you turn to someone with ALS say: "Dear friend I want to be affixed with my conscience and I raise you the hope of your recovery."
Yet you gave an image of a God, sorry to those who offered further hope in medicine to the sick.
I can not forget, even though I had less than 18 years, your compliance with these absurdities of life, prefer to tiny cells with no meaning at that stage, if implanted in a woman, is treated as waste and as a possible lifesaving.
All this because you have cleverly created a sin and the church knows that sins may be useful to influence people. You should teach how to do and make an accurate and thorough examination of conscience prior to discharge and perform.
What do you care? To kill human beings? You have helped to do so with many diseases and all the people who did not deign to vote in the hope of denying science. If for you the blastocysts are human beings and those who crack nailed to a bed without the ability to move a finger and with the intellectual capabilities undamaged then fully conscious should not have the freedom to receive treatment you must at least explain to the world of divine that certainly does not belong to you.
You have used your freedom to hinder that of others, others who need this freedom.
You have tried to impose your will through the will of God, but have forgotten what Saint Paul said: the foolishness of God is greater than human intelligence. This phrase says a lot, God loves and respects human intelligence as well as being one of his works is something smaller than himself.
This you should know about his love of God in this gift that makes us unique tools with the ability to create and give love to free us from evil and to avoid being an obstacle for those in need.
I hope will understand the reasons that prompted me to write is not presumptuous to judge me wrong, I wrote for the same duty that pushes me to live and fight for a just world and civil.
The greetings and best wishes leave
Galdy Federico
0 comments:
Post a Comment